LETTER: The Case For An Independent Redistricting Commission In Massachusetts

Dear Editor:

Massachusetts is the birthplace of the “Gerrymander,” named after Governor Elbridge Gerry in 1812. Two centuries later, the Commonwealth remains a prime example of why politicians should not draw their own district lines. While Massachusetts is often seen as a leader in civic progress, its redistricting process remains controlled by the State Legislature—a system that inherently prioritizes incumbent protection over competitive democracy.

The primary need for an IRC in Massachusetts isn’t necessarily to fix partisan “red vs. blue” unfairness, as the state is overwhelmingly Democratic. Instead, the current system creates “safe seats” that stifle political challenge. When legislators draw the maps, they can effectively “choose their voters,” leading to a staggering number of uncontested races. This lack of competition breeds voter apathy; if the outcome is predetermined by the map, the incentive to vote or run for office evaporates.

Furthermore, an independent commission ensures that “communities of interest”—geographic, ethnic, or economic neighborhoods—are kept together. Under the current legislative control, these communities are often “cracked” (split apart) or “packed” (concentrated) to serve the political survival of an individual representative rather than the needs of the residents.

By shifting this power to a non-partisan, transparent body of citizens, Massachusetts can move toward a system where representatives are truly accountable to the people, ensuring that every vote actually has the power to influence the outcome of an election.

It’s time to vote out every official who opposes an Independent Redistricting Commission for Massachusetts!

George Ferdinand

Tewksbury