WILMINGTON, MA — Selectman Candidate Joseph Lavino was recently asked the following questions by Wilmington Apple — What grade would you give to Town Manager Jeff Hull’s performance? Why? Any areas of improvement? What grade would you give to the current Board of Selectmen’s performance? Why? Any areas of improvement? How do you see yourself fitting in with the current Board?
Below is Lavino’s response, in his own words:
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to these questions. Let me preface by stating that due to the compressed timeframe, in which I have had the opportunity to observe the function of Wilmington town government, my comments will be limited to recent events.
In general, I have had many years of experience in assessing performance, coaching and providing feedback to individuals. I believe these experiences will serve the Board of Selectmen well. When assessing performance, I feel it is critical to take a 3 pronged approach: 1) subjective, first-hand observation of the desired or un-desired behaviors, 2) objective, measurable performance metrics compared to clearly articulated and defined goals, and lastly 3) third party feedback on the individual.
Based on my observations at Board of Selectmen meetings, Mr. Hull presents himself as a man of integrity, intellect and principle. From an objective standpoint, I believe the increase in “free cash” is a testament to prudent fiscal responsibility and the driving of initiatives to move Wilmington forward as a leader in the State of Massachusetts is a position I am strongly aligned with. I believe I would collaborate well with Mr. Hull as a Selectman.
With any public official, there is a degree of public scrutiny and constructive criticism that is expected to be received. As a corporate attorney, it is a daily occurrence for me to frame tough arguments and receive scrutiny on all my decision making. As such, I have developed a “thick skin” over time and am constantly reminded that I am held accountable for every action taken whether large or small. I feel this is critical for a Selectman and I feel I bring that to the table as a candidate, above and beyond my competitors. Although I appreciate Mr. Hull’s performance and attributes, Mr. Hull is certainly not exempt from receiving constructive feedback, as he well knows along with the rest of the Selectmen. I believe an area of opportunity was in the approach and response taken to theft problems at Wildwood Cemetery. Mr. Hull’s response as quoted in the May 12, 2015 article in the Wilmington Apple was “I don’t think there is any easy answer. To the extent that people are interested in offering ideas, we’re willing to listen, but I don’t see any easy answer.. To some measure, our hands are tied. There is no easy solution.” Although I agree that an easy solution does not exist, nonetheless, there is a solution. No solution to an issue is easy. With perseverance, process and adherence to guiding principles, a solution will reveal itself.
In regards to the observed performance of the Selectmen, they too are people of integrity and great skill. I appreciate their dedication and caring for the town and people of Wilmington. I also appreciate the knowledge they bring to the Board and there is no doubt as to their intent to serve the town of Wilmington. It takes a special kind of person to dedicate your time to the community and for that they should all be commended. That being said, and without naming names or specific events, there were 2 observed behaviors that I am not aligned with and as Selectman, absolutely pledge to never demonstrate.
On one occasion, an innovative and outside the box solution was vocalized in public session by one of the Selectmen to address an issue that was important to many people throughout town. The solution was thoughtful, utilized the law and was attainable. In my observation, when the solution was presented, it was clearly visible to me sitting in the audience that the other Board members, including the Town Manager, were hearing this solution for the first time and appeared to be caught off guard. Although the proposed solution was great, as a layperson sitting in the audience, this was perceived as a communication gap and gave the appearance that the Board was not on the same page. As candidate for Selectman, I would bring communication, transparency and collaboration, as vital competencies which I practice every day, to the Board. I’m well aware that there are and will be disagreements amongst the Board members, however, the method of airing those disagreements is critical and I bring an enhanced sensitivity to the perception of the public based on the behaviors and tactics taken by the Selectmen.
On another occasion, a prospective licensee and their attorney presented in front of the Board seeking a license approval. To my surprise, one of the Board members, in public session, openly referred to the attorney as a “friend” on multiple occasions throughout the transaction. I don’t believe there is any place for this in town government. Although Wilmington is a close knit, family friendly community, I believe the Selectmen need to give the perception, at all times, of impartiality. Furthermore, the Selectmen must conduct themselves in an impartial fashion and must never let personal relationships influence decision making by the Board. As a candidate for Selectman, I am a blank slate. I have no legal conflicts of interest whatsoever that may affect the outcome of a vote due to a recusal. I have no perceived conflicts of interest. I have no friends and family influencing my decision making. I have no biases and no preconceived opinions without the facts. As a Wilmington newcomer, this is a distinct and substantial advantage over my competitors, who are all life-long residents. Seeing a Selectman referencing a friend in public session does not give me confidence as a “non-friend” that I will get an equal and fair shake. As Selectman, I will represent all the residents of Wilmington equally, whether you were born here or just moved in.
On a lighter note, I feel that my years of experience in working with cross functional groups, partnering across boundaries, working with legislators, and influencing regulators are all key components that should give the voters comfort that I will work in a very collaborative, effective and professional manner with the remaining Selectmen.
Thank you for the opportunity to present my opinions. For more info, please “like” my Facebook page or message me at http://www.facebook.com/LavinoForWilmington or call my cell at 781-801-0607.
About The Questions
During this local election season, Wilmington Apple will ask a question of all the Selectmen candidates each week. Wilmington Apple will run one response per day, Monday through Thursday, with a recap on Friday. Responses are in the candidates’ own words, unedited. Each candidate is given the same question and the same amount of time (approximately one week) to answer. Order of answers will alternate each week.
About The Election
Four candidates — Greg Bendel, Kevin Caira, Joseph Lavino, and Thomas Miller — will be competing for two open 3-year seats on the Wilmington Board of Selectmen. Longtime incumbents Lou Cimaglia and Mike Newhouse are not seeking re-election. The Town Election will be held on Saturday, April 23. Polls will be open from 8am to 8pm.
Like Wilmington Apple on Facebook. Follow Wilmington Apple on Twitter. Subscribe to Wilmington Apple’s daily email newsletter HERE. Got a comment, question, photo, press release, or news tip? Email wilmingtonapple@gmail.com.
Wilmington Apple 